To get started in terms of what to build, Scrum requires no more than a Product Owner with enough ideas for a first Sprint, a Development Team to implement those ideas and a Scrum Master to help guide the process.
A. True
B. False
To get started in terms of what to build, Scrum requires no more than a Product Owner with enough ideas for a first Sprint, a Development Team to implement those ideas and a Scrum Master to help guide the process.
A. True
B. False
I do not like this question nor the answer. Scrum talks about it being a framework of which all elements should be in play in order for it to be called scrum. Albeit it is possible to implement only portions of the framework, however this is not recognised as true scrum.
Therefore, with a question as vague as this, how do we know scrum is being adopted correctly in terms of the proper events etc that would enable planning of the increment in question?
Well said. I agree with all of what you stated. Because it’s correct.
And I like this question because it shows how easy it is to begin scrum. All you need is a good idea and a few people with the right altitude. But then you have to follow the guide, facilitate the events and create the artifacts, But that’s not part of the question.
Shouldn’t there be a mention of stakeholders (where the ideas should come from)?
Why? Can’t the product owner has some ideas of his own? This bad boy and totally reckless PO himself got some ideas.