Which configuration does significantly reduce the label allocations without compromising LDP functionalities?

An MPLS network infrastructure of the service provider ABC is growing very quickly due to many recent acquisitions. Concerns arise about labeling each and every IP address on the service provider core network. The IP address pace is designed as per following:
▪ Service provide ip address range is: 10.0.0.0/16
▪ All loopbacks addresses use subnet mask /32
▪ 10.0.0.0/24 range is used for loopback addresses
▪ All other subnet masks used for links are /24 and /25
Which configuration does significantly reduce the label allocations without compromising LDP functionalities?
A. ip prefix-list List1 deny 10.0.0.0/16le 20 ge 25!mpls ldp label allocate global prefix-list List1
B. access-list 1 permit 10.0.0.0.0.0.255.255mpls ldp neighbor 10.0.0.1 labels accept 3
C. mpls ldp password required for 10!access-list 10 permit 10.0.0.1access-list 10 permit 10.0.0.2access-list 10 permit 10.0.0.3
D. mpls ldp label allocate global host-routes

cisco-exams

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


The reCAPTCHA verification period has expired. Please reload the page.