Which relationship type should you use between the Shipment table and the new dimension?

Note: This question is part of a series of questions that use the same or similar answer choices. An answer choice may be correct for more than one question in the series. Each question is independent of the other questions in this series. Information and details provided in a question apply only to that question.
You have a Microsoft SQL Server Analysis Services (SSAS) instance that is configured to use multidimensional mode. You create the following cube:

You need to create a new dimension that allows users to list shipments by the country where the product is shipped.
Which relationship type should you use between the Shipment table and the new dimension?
A. no relationship
B. regular
C. fact
D. referenced
E. many-to-many
F. data mining

microsoft-exams

3 thoughts on “Which relationship type should you use between the Shipment table and the new dimension?

  1. If you only create a Country dimension with a Regular relationship with the Shipment fact table, you may not be able to retrieve the Product.

    I do agree with the Answer Many-to-Many Relationship with InternetSales as Intermediate Fact Table and Customers as the Regular dimension acting as link between both fact tables.

    Valid reference URL: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/analysis-services/multidimensional-models-olap-logical-cube-objects/dimension-relationships?view=asallproducts-allversions

  2. The diagram suggests two separate fact tables exist with no way to join shipments to internetsales so the suggested “correct answer” with a ‘many-to-many’ relationship makes no sense here. Shipment to country would be regular.

    1. It says “Shipment table and the new dimension”, not country. So there is a new table between Shipment and Country

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


The reCAPTCHA verification period has expired. Please reload the page.