Which traffic-conditioning mechanism buffers packets during congestion, instead of dropping them?

Which traffic-conditioning mechanism buffers packets during congestion, instead of dropping them?
A. shaping
B. policing
C. packet fragmentation and interleaving
D. class-selector PHB
E. PHB

cisco-exams

4 thoughts on “Which traffic-conditioning mechanism buffers packets during congestion, instead of dropping them?

  1. CIPTV1 book page 313

    “Shaping, on the other hand, involves regulating excessive traffic rates by delaying (buffering) traffic.”

  2. I agree (A)
    Shaping implies the existence of a queue and of sufficient memory to buffer delayed packets, while policing does not.

  3. In other words, a PHB refers to the packet scheduling, queueing, policing, or shaping behavior of a node on any given packet belonging to a BA, as configured by a service level agreement (SLA) or a policy map.

    Traffic Shaping (Regulating Packet Flow)–Traffic shaping “shapes” the flow of traffic by reducing outbound flow traffic to avoid congestion. Traffic shaping constrains traffic to a particular bit rate using a token bucket mechanism.
    checking any example of configuration :

    Class bronze
    Traffic Shaping
    Average Rate Traffic Shaping
    CIR 320000 (bps) Max. Buffers Limit 1000 (Packets)
    Weighted Fair Queueing
    Bandwidth 15 (%) Max Threshold 64 (packets)

    I can see the option of buffers limit.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


The reCAPTCHA verification period has expired. Please reload the page.