What could be the cause of this problem?

Given the following configurations, CK2 and CK3 are not able to successfully establish the IBGP session using the loopback 0 interfaces. What could be the cause of this problem?
!!
output omitted
!
hostname CK2
!
interface loopback 0
ip address 2.2.2.2
!
interface e0
ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
no shut
!
interface e1
ip address 10.2.2.1 255.255.255.0
no shut
!
router bgp 65101
neighbor 172.16.1.1 remote-as 65100
neighbor 3.3.3.3 remote-as 65101
!
router eigrp 101
network 10.0.0.0
network 2.0.0.0
!!! output omitted
!
hostname CK3
!
interface loopback 0
ip address 3.3.3.3
!
interface e0
ip address 10.1.1.2 255.255.255.0
no shut
!
interface e1
ip address 10.2.2.2 255.255.255.0
no shut
!
router bgp 65101
neighbor 192.168.1.1 remote-as 65102
neighbor 2.2.2.2 remote-as 65101
!
router eigrp 101
network 10.0.0.0
network 3.0.0.0
!
Exhibit:

642-661-configuring-bgp-on-cisco-routers-bgp_img_205

A. The “No Sync” BGP configuration command is missing.
B. CK2 and CK3 are not using the loopback0 IP address as the source address for the BGP messages to each other.
C. The “network 2.0.0.0” BGP configuration command is missing on CK2 and the “network 3.0.0.0” BGP configuration command is missing on CK3 .
D. The “neighbor 2.2.2.2 ibgp-multihop 2” BGP configuration command is missing on CK3 and the “neighbor 3.3.3.3 ibgp-multihop 2” BGP configuration command is missing on CK2 .

cisco-exams

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


The reCAPTCHA verification period has expired. Please reload the page.