Which approach will meet the technical and security requirements while minimizing costs?

A company has 225 mobile and desktop devices and 300 partner VPNs that need access to an AWS VPC. VPN users should not be able to reach one another.
Which approach will meet the technical and security requirements while minimizing costs?
A. Use the AWS IPsec VPN for the mobile, desktop, and partner VPN connections. Use network access control lists (Network ACLs) and security groups to maintain routing separation.
B. Use the AWS IPsec VPN for the partner VPN connections. Use an Amazon EC2 instance VPN for the mobile and desktop devices. Use Network ACLs and security groups to maintain routing separation.
C. Create an AWS Direct Connect connection between on-premises and AWS Use a public virtual interface to connect to the AWS IPsec VPN for the mobile, desktop, and partner VPN connections.
D. Use an Amazon EC2 instance VPN for the desktop, mobile, and partner VPN connections. Use features of the VPN instance to limit routing and connectivity.

amazon-exams

2 thoughts on “Which approach will meet the technical and security requirements while minimizing costs?

  1. D Correct
    B is wrong – AWS limits 10 IPSec per VGW and 5 VGWs per VPC, meaning max 50 IPSec VPNs per VPC. No way to roll out 300 partner VPN within one VPC over AWS managed VPN…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


The reCAPTCHA verification period has expired. Please reload the page.