Refer to the exhibit. What is the main reason why the Wi-Fi design engineer took a different approach than installing the APs in the offices, even though that installation provides better coverage?
A. aesthetics
B. transmit power considerations
C. antenna gain
D. power supply considerations
According to this document https://community.cisco.com/kxiwq67737/attachments/kxiwq67737/6015-discussions-wireless/10130/1/Cisco%20Connected%20Mobile%20Experiences%20(CMX)%20CVD.pdf
“For aesthetic reasons, facilities management has decided that access points
will not be placed within any of the executive offices or conference rooms located between the hallway
corridors and the physical perimeter. Because of these restrictions, our convex hull now lies at the
outside edge of the corridor (indicated by the blue rectangle) and not at the true physical perimeter of
the floor”.
The question says: “even though that installation provides better coverage”, so trx power considerations has no sense.
The APs should be inside the offices, but they are outside, the only reason could be aesthetics.
Would this not be Aesthetics?