A phone is assigned to a partition that is included in the CSS HQ-Phone. This partition contains a route pattern to block calls to service numbers 1-400-xxx-xxxx.
When the engineer makes a test call to the number 1-400-400-9000 from that phone, the call goes through. What is the reason for this issue?
A. The route pattern for the number to be blocked is in partition not accessible to the CSS.
B. The correct route list is not selected in the route pattern for the dialed number to be blocked.
C. The correct gateway is not selected for the route list for the route pattern for the dialed number to be blocked.
D. The route pattern for the number to be blocked is in "NULL" partition.
E. The route pattern is misconfigured.
It’s the CSS which determines what partitions are used, there is no mention of what CSS the phone has assigned, only the partition it is in, which only determines who can reach it, not what it can reach.
So it must be A
I did a test calls from my lab
and I think the only option regarding the bad spelling of the question is that Route pattern is misconfigured
with route option : Route this pattern
Results Summary
Calling Party Information
Dialed Digits = 914004009000
Match Result = RouteThisPattern
Matched Pattern Information
Called Party Number = 14004009000
Time Zone = America/Mexico_City
End Device = GW_SPconnet
Call Classification = OffNet
with route option: Block this pattern: Call Rejected :
Results Summary
Calling Party Information
Dialed Digits = 914004009000
Match Result = BlockThisPattern
Route Block Cause = Call Rejected
Matched Pattern Information
Called Party Number = 14004009000
Time Zone = America/Mexico_City
End Device = GW_SPconnet
Call Classification =
correct answer : E. The route pattern is misconfigured.
I think correct answer is E too
This question is so badly written it’s hard to know whether the correct answer is A or E.
This text is terrible:
“A phone is assigned to a partition that is included in the CSS HQ-Phone. This partition contains a route pattern to block calls to service numbers 1-400-xxx-xxxx.”
Phones aren’t assigned to partitions. If you assume this means:
“A phone is assigned the CSS HQ-Phone which contains a partition for a route pattern to block calls to service numbers 1-400-xxx-xxxx.”
Then that would seem to rule out A which leaves E as the only possible answer.
I would also go for E,
On the Route Pattern the Route Option > Block this Pattern is probably not set.
The route pattern is configured right. In the question don’t say anything about what CSS is used by the line or the phone, so the call don’t match the blocked route pattern. Right answer is A
Why not E? i’m thinking about route option that could be misconfigured